Jump to content

mfrg

Real Deal
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4
  • NF$

    120

mfrg last won the day on March 10

mfrg had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

14 Good

2 Followers

About mfrg

  • Rank
    Ambitious

Profile Information

  • Public Name
    mg

Recent Profile Visitors

216 profile views
  1. mfrg

    Puzzling

    “Even if that comment was admittedly a little ironic for a guy who seems to get his news almost exclusively from an outlet as far left as The Gaurdian.” I wrote for the Guardian and they syndicated my blog for years. George Monboint writes for them as well, and man would I love anyone here to get into an argument about climate change with him - the noted “lefty that he obviously is.” The Guardian broke Snowden - and if you’re of the opinion that the information he leaked was not absolutely quintessential with regards to public knowledge of highly illegal actions - you’re either a fool or too dim witted to understand it. But I have subscriptions to The Atlantic and other “intelligent” conservative publications as well. My comment on political polarization was dead on. And it’s something I believe in strongly. I am neither a proponent of the left or right. I believe reason is quintessential to properly tune out the nonsense of polarization. Right and wrong exist in this world. What does it matter who reports it if it objectively calls wrongdoing out? To say I get my information wholly from the Guardian - as an example of a singular accusation- is to say that I support its position on what took place in Charlottesville. And I absolutely do. An innocent woman was killed and the night before, in a nation that helped defeat National Socialism, people were marching torches in hand, as if at Nuremberg, chanting “Jews will not replace us.” So what wholly “objective” source out there had a better take on those events? Only those that pander to those that support hate - and that is not journalism. I don’t agree with all of the paper’s content, there’s been many occasions that I’ve disagreed with OpEds. But, given these ridiculous times, one does not think before using a single publication to paint a entirely one sided picture. And isn’t that just the height of intellect.
  2. With regards to Toronto, COVID-19 is playing a big part in attendance. While shows have mostly been full, the last two sold out, the spectre of going to a place with a lot of people in it is very real. The German health minister today announced his recommendation that no event in the entire country be larger than 1,000 people - including sporting matches. Yesterday in parts of Italy, major matches were played to empty stadiums. Sufficed to say that now is not the best time to be touring.
  3. When I wrote this album I knew that a lot of this would emerge. The reality is that many are stuck in the past and can’t get beyond what they perceive as what my “sonics” should be. Songwriting is not paint by numbers. My favourite song is Tangled Up In Blue by Bob Dylan - a song of verses, amazing lyrics, but no choruses, and no massive sonic shifts. Storytelling is an art. A Thousand Tons, for example, tells a story, and how it’s musically arranged matches it. Explosions or “big finishes” etc are not the point. The emptiness that it suddenly returns to is the point. The reality is the “typical” course of action is deferred to as “what should be done” rather than attempting to seriously examine how the song imparts a message. I have, over the last few months, contemplated retiring. I have confronted what actors must endure with regards to type casting, and given my age and the fact that I can just make music at home for myself and my friends, it might be more fulfilling. I’m almost 50 and have zero interest in making consecutive Beautiful Midnights, etc. That was decades ago. And even those albums since, especially the last one, were written without facing any internal compulsion to change. And that’s on me. After Lights, I should have just kept going. When I sat down and wrote Arrows it was just easy. I’d seen the dissatisfaction on the faces of concert goers on the Lights tour and knee jerked. It’s something I should never have done. The same is true of Chaotic Neutral which should have sustained the vibe of Harridan, Tiger, Cold Water, Los Alamos, etc, without the interjection of “rock songs”. Again, that’s on me. At some point you’ve got to look at yourself and make a decision. The knee jerk reactions that occur given significant successes decades ago cannot be the present. In fact, in many cases, they should never have remained in your subconscious and turned you away from going somewhere else. In the end, given music today, all of this is basically pointless. Artistry has no worth. For a monthly fee on a streaming service you can listen to whatever you want. Ask a plumber to work for $8.99 a month and they’d laugh at you. Reading comments complaining about ticket prices is also rather hilarious when you think that people pay over $100 to see a stadium show sitting in the nose bleeds. It’s all relative, and to me all very perplexing and disheartening. Leonardo da Vinci's Salvator Mundi sold for $450 million dollars in 2017. It is the most expensive piece of art ever sold. To me, Mozart is worth no less. In truth, his collected works, given the impact they’ve had, are worth vastly more. But you can download all of Don Giovanni for the price of a monthly music subscription. What artists do is not pedestrian. Were that the case, everyone would be an artist. There is good and bad art, art is subjective. There are artists whose genius is not realized in their lifetimes, there are artists whose genius alters the discourse of entire generations during their lifetimes. There are catchy tunes that are massive hits that are laughed at a decade later. There are albums that sell next to nothing that spread like spider webs to influence thousands in the deepest recesses of their soul. The most important aspect of art is, in truth, not how it initially impacts us, but how it challenges us intellectually and spiritually to succumb to something we are not so easily accustomed to. Satiating the masses at any given point given popular methodologies is not difficult. Challenging individuals to discover something buried within them that transverses the barrier between instant gratification and the longevity of a love affair is not the goal of an artist, but the dream of every artist. Because to accomplish the latter is to leave a legacy. In the words of Marcel Duchamp - “What art is, in reality, is this missing link, not the links which exist. It's not what you see that is art; art is the gap.” So mind the gap.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.