9-11

[Gob]

Normally I tend to delete frivilous e-mails that I get from friends because they are a waste of time. But I checked this out and was pretty suprised. You should open of Microsoft Word and try what I bolded below.

 

EDIT: It's all a hoax, and some of the information below is false.

 

1) New York City has 11 letters

 

2) Afghanistan has 11 letters.

 

3) Ramsin Yuseb (The terrorist who threatened to destroy the Twin Towers in 1993) has 11 letters.

 

4) George W Bush has 11 letters.

 

This could be a mere coincidence, but this gets more interesting:

 

1) New York is the 11th state.

 

2) The first plane crashing against the Twin Towers was flight number 11.

 

3) Flight 11 was carrying 92 passengers. 9 + 2 = 11

 

4) Flight 77 which also hit Twin Towers, was carrying 65 passengers. 6+5 = 11

 

5) The tragedy was on September 11, or 9/11 as it is now known. 9 + 1+ 1 = 11

 

6) The date is equal to the US emergency services telephone number 911. 9 + 1 + 1 = 11.

 

Sheer coincidence..?! Read on and make up your own mind:

 

1) The total number of victims inside all the hi-jacked planes was 254. 2 + 5 + 4 = 11.

 

2) September 11 is day number 254 of the calendar year. Again 2 + 5 + 4 = 11.

 

3) The Madrid bombing took place on 3/11/2004. 3 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 4 = 11.

 

4) The tragedy of Madrid happened 911 days after the Twin Towers incident.

 

Now this is where things get totally eerie:

 

The most recognised sym bol for the US, after the Stars & Stripes, is the Eagle. The following verse is taken from the

 

Quran, the Islamic holy book:

 

"For it is written that a son of Arabia would awaken a fearsome Eagle. The wrath of the Eagle would be felt throughout the lands of Allah and lo, while some of the people trembled in despair still more rejoiced: for the wrath of the Eagle cleansed the lands of Allah and there was peace."

 

That verse is number 9.11 of the Quran.

 

Still uncovinced about all of this..?! Try this and see how you feel afterwards, it made my hair stand on end:

 

Open Microsoft Word and do the following:

 

1. Type in capitals Q33 NY. This is the flight number of the first plane to hit one of the Twin Towers.

 

2. Highlight the Q33 NY.

 

3. Change the font size to 48.

 

4. Change the actual font to the WINGDINGS

 

What do you think now?!!

Edited February 3, 2006 by Gob

[HoboFactory]

Not this again, a lot of that stuff is just plain lies.

 

For example, #3 has no meaning at all, as the guy's name is not an English one, it had many alternate spellings and transliterations into English, in many cases, these do not have 11 letters.

 

The total victims on the hi-jacked was not 254, but rather 265 (2+6+5 is not 11)

 

The verse quoted from the Quran says absolutely nothing of that nature, so that's just made up.

 

Also, from what I understand, there was absolutely no kind of flight designation of any kind called "Q33 NY."

[Prometheon]

Yeah it's just bullshit.

 

Who the hell would make an intricate conspiracy involving the number of letters in various components names? It just doesn't make any sense.

[ecnarf]

I hate people who are into all this numerology bullshit. I emphasize the word bullshit.

[Spritzup]

Yeah it's just bullshit.

 

Who the hell would make an intricate conspiracy involving the number of letters in various components names? It just doesn't make any sense.

I would, just cuz you know... it'd fuck with the conspirators minds.

[RicardoObviouso]

I emphasize the word bullshit.

that is one of my top ten words to emphasize.

 

 

its a pretty far fetch, but i will definetly freak out some of my office girls with this one.

 

 

 

 

edit: speaking of numbers and conspiracies... this is post #666 for me. i must be the devil or something.

Edited February 4, 2006 by one_trick_pony

[ecnarf]

No. We've all had posts #666, 69, etc...

[RicardoObviouso]

so what you're saying is we're all the devil?

[HoboFactory]

I think the majority of those registered here probably haven't.

[RicardoObviouso]

he speaks from an elitest class. like when some rich guy says "we all wear cashmere to bed".

[HoboFactory]

One time I sat on my cell phone, and when I picked it up it had apparently dialed 666, it left me mildly un-nerved for the following 5 minutes.

[RicardoObviouso]

thats not quite nearly as bad as the time i sat on my phone and it dialed "mmmm, i love ass".

 

 

 

 

talk about being mildly un-nerved.

[HoboFactory]

I would have been flattered.

[Lauren]

i actually lol'd.

 

i have yet to sit on my phone.

Edited February 5, 2006 by Lauren

[supercanuk]

I love how stupid forwards like this get passed around which have nothing at all to do with anything and just fuel conspiracy nut-bag's when there are ACTUAL unanswered questions about 9/11 that are worth investigating rationally. For example this.

[ecnarf]

he speaks from an elitest class. like when some rich guy says "we all wear cashmere to bed".

We don't?

[Ravenous Yam]

Numerology is the least of our worries, but ince we're talking conspiracy theories, some structural engineers have made the claim that the manner in which the WTC towers collapsed is totally inconsistent with impact or fire and is only technically possible for those structures with a controlled demolition. Implosion/demolitions experts have said that under any circumstances, the collapse of the WTC towers (straight down, little surrounding damage) would be considered absolutely flawless as a controlled demoltion.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories

 

Many witnesses, including numerous NY City firefighters and workers in the Towers retold the event with the use of words such as "bomb" or "explosion" to describe what they heard during the attack up to the subsequent collapse. Many witnesses describe multiple sounds heard before the collapses bearing curious and unique features. One observer recalls, "It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions," as well as this impression, "It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions."

 

Also note that jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, which was the official reason for the collapse. There are so many inconsistencies with the entire series of events that i don't know what to believe. The hole in the Pentagon wasn't big enough for a plane, and apparently there was little or no debris at that site.

 

Here is an extremely well done flash video investigating the inconsistencies in the Pentagon event. I highly recommmend everyone watch it. http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon.php

 

Definitely encroaching into the area of guys-with-tinfoil-hats, but who says they're always wrong? It's not like the US doesn't have the means or the motive to start a war with the Middle East.

[ecnarf]

First of all, there was a hell of a lot of surrounding damage. A whole other building collapsed within the WTC collapsed because of the buildings falling down.

 

Secondly, the fire wasn't hot enough to melt steel, but you don't need steel to melt before it becomes structurally unsound. So, think about it - really hot fire, steel becomes too weak to support the floors on top, and everything pancakes down. It's not impossible to imagine.

[Ravenous Yam]

For your first point, there would have been a lot more damage, had they, for instance... fell any direction but straight down. I meant little damage compared to the potential for surrounding damage it had. For Manhattan, the damage sustained was fairly little. WTC7 collapsed straight down as well, which is also unusual.

 

Secondly, they actually claimed it melted.

 

Hey, I said it was tinfoil hat stuff! I'm sorta playing devil's advocate here. While I find it interesting, I am not convinced of a grand conspiracy about 9/11.

[RicardoObviouso]

he speaks from an elitest class. like when some rich guy says "we all wear cashmere to bed".

We don't?

ooooooh, exactly 8 characters. good one.

[supercanuk]

Yah i think we are dealing with foilhat stuff here, but it's also one of these types of situation's that should just have a full inquiry into it to answer all the questions raised. A lot of these are legit question and we should never doubt questioning something simply to believe the official line of a story. The way we learn more about things is questioning, so i really don't think we should get dismissive in our thoughts as to call them conspiracy theories unless you can prove they have no basis. Since no body has yet proven these things true or false nobody can say anything really.

[RicardoObviouso]

the wtc was designed to withhold open flame for two hours. it did its job then gracefully fell into itself and not on to other buildings.

 

 

 

 

it went down like a bad card table, like the tacoma narrows bridge.

[ecnarf]

For your first point, there would have been a lot more damage, had they, for instance... fell any direction but straight down. I meant little damage compared to the potential for surrounding damage it had. For Manhattan, the damage sustained was fairly little. WTC7 collapsed straight down as well, which is also unusual.

 

Secondly, they actually claimed it melted.

 

Hey, I said it was tinfoil hat stuff! I'm sorta playing devil's advocate here. While I find it interesting, I am not convinced of a grand conspiracy about 9/11.

It's interesting that you should mention there would have been more damage had the buildings fallen any direction but down. Because the buildings DID fall straight down, and there wasn't any more damage than there was. Cosmic.

 

Secondly, who claimed it melted? I remember watching the news and those idiots telling us the flames were hotter than the melting point of steel, but that's not the case. Fact is, kerosene fuel burns pretty effing hot, and you don't need to melt steel to ruin its structual integrity.

 

Lastly, get your facts straight. It's aluminum foil.

[Ravenous Yam]

Damn you, ecnarf! Always destroying what i say. But yeah, you're right.

 

[jmwilson529]

that is just a phenomenal picture