Eragon

[Crusader]

eragon was a bad movie and they shouldn't make a sequel.

 

it was really predictable and calling one of the bad guys "Shades" made it even lamer. Talking dragons are dumb, even more so when they're telepathic.

 

SPOILER (Highlight to View)

oh yeah, since they killed jeremy irons it'll be ever worse. i hope john malkovich just starts re-enacting his blockbuster hit, being john malkovitch, instead of the stupid king thing he's doing in this one.

 

[hide_me]it's a really bad movie.[/hide_me]

 

edit: yes, i put it in this section because it doesn't count fall under the category of movie to me.

[Hyphnip]

...why would you even see that piece of anus movie?

[shade]

I read the book last year for kicks...it was decent for a 19 year old. The movie was shit.

[Crusader]

...why would you even see that piece of anus movie?

i thought it couldn't possibly be as bad as it looked.

[Hyphnip]

yeah, thats what I thought about "The Hills Have Eyes"

it was so bad a girl in the theatre had a miscarriage.

[Crusader]

that's amazing. 300, on the other hand, was better than it looked.

[Hyphnip]

agreed.

going into it, I thought it'd be an 8 or 9 out of 10

 

it was well above that.

[Jarrod]

The movie sucked ass. I saw it when I moved here. I didn't want to but a friend of mine wanted to.