New Michael Moore Film

[pearanoid]

Once again, a documentary does not have to show both sides. It only has to show what it wants to serve it's purpose.

[Dan #2]

you know, everyone is biased. I don't agree with everything Micheal Moore says, but i still hate bush.

 

I wish people would realize that Micheal Moore isn't the only person who does this. I have seen both Fahrenheit 9/11 and FahrenHYPE 9/11, and WOW. Moore was miles ahead of that crap, and i'm not saying that cuz i'm a lefty, i'm saying that because Moore doesn't edit in random quips from inbred hillbilly's. At least Moore used known people, or people who have some attatchment to the topic.

 

And the shot in fahrenheit 9/11 where that lady whose son died in Iraq is at the white house and gets bitched at by some other lady, that looked SOOO staged, as if to give the right wing and intrusive and conrontational demeanor. I don't know if it was real or not, but i didn't like that part..

[saturnine]

A documentary is meant to educate someone.

right. but if that was its sole purpose, then it probably wouldn't be entertaining and if it's not entertaining, then it's not making 100 million dollars. people enjoy watching guerilla interviews

 

Why do you assume entertainment and education are mutually exclusive? Something can be informative and people will still sit through it. By your logic, museums should have arcades.

that would rule

[WinstonSmith357]

Somebody told me Michael Moore was making his next movie about privacy and freedom of speech issues.