Jump to content
Doormat

So Close To Nuclear Asplosion.

Recommended Posts

Not really. The likelyhood of a nuclear warhead detonating properly in an accidental collision is extremely low. Even if the conventional explosives packed into the nuke explode (don't get me wrong, that's still a lot of explosives) the weapon is unlikley to go supercritical and begin a fission or fusion reaction unless it was detonated on purpose (requiring a precise sequence of events to occur within the warhead to achieve an actual nuclear blast.) Radiological contamintion, however, is a certainty in that scenario, assuming the hull of the sub is breached. The fissionable core of the weapon will be blown apart and spread into the surrounding water.

 

Anyway. I guess it was bound to happen some day. Probability and all that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. The likelyhood of a nuclear warhead detonating properly in an accidental collision is extremely low. Even if the conventional explosives packed into the nuke explode (don't get me wrong, that's still a lot of explosives) the weapon is unlikley to go supercritical and begin a fission or fusion reaction unless it was detonated on purpose (requiring a precise sequence of events to occur within the warhead to achieve an actual nuclear blast.) Radiological contamintion, however, is a certainty in that scenario, assuming the hull of the sub is breached. The fissionable core of the weapon will be blown apart and spread into the surrounding water.

 

Anyway. I guess it was bound to happen some day. Probability and all that.

 

How about if they noticed that they hit something?

 

"Oh shit! The Russians"

*Both subs fire torpedoes*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Both subs fire torpedoes*

 

At that distance, a single torpedo from either sub would most likely destroy both. Shockwaves from submarine explosions are a lot more damaging than shock waves in atmosphere. Of course, with torpedo tubes generally mounted forward (sometimes aft) that would mean the submarines would probably have had to collide head-on....guaranteeing major damage to both unless they were both travelling dead slow. Even then...6 or 7 thousand tons makes for a lot of inertia.

 

Still, it's unlikely the nukes would go off.I haven't been following closely....were they missile subs or hunter-killers? the H-Ks would generally be nuclear powered, but not armed with nuclear weapons.

Edited by Sparq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maneuver for a firing solution. In that case, the sub with the rear-firing tubes has the advantage, assuming the collision was a head-on sideswipe. In the current political climate, a direct confrontation seems....unlikely. Especially in the Atlantic.

 

For the record, I don't know whether modern subs usually have aft tubes. My knowledge is primarily air and land, theoretical and current weapons. Naval surface ships next. Sub-surface last.

Edited by Sparq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.