Suicide Girls

[Converge]

www.suicidegirls.com (i think)

 

Does this defy tradition or play the same old hat?

[WalrusMeat]

I hate Suicide girls.

 

They have a DVD out now, I saw an add for it in my Revolver and choked on my gum.

[mrs jesus]

it would be defying tradition if the girls weren't airbrushed all to fuck. but they are.

[Shiri]

They're still hot. I don't care.

[borntohula]

i think it propigates another form of beauty, like, you need tatoos and piercings in order to be considerred hot. im not sure if its actually offerring up an "alternative" to mainstream centerfolds, specifically because if the market did not exist for such a website, i doubt they would exist.

 

i borrowed a friends account once, and didnt really see the big deal about it. maybe its just me. some were hot. most weren't.

[mrs jesus]

They're still hot. I don't care.

yeah, they're hot, but anyone can be hot with the right amount of photoshopping.

 

i know a girl that went to one of the suicidegirls 'gatherings' and said that in person, a lot of the girls looked totally different than they do in their pictures,

and not in a good way.

 

<shrug>

[josiegross]

dave navarro wears more make up than any of them. why is he on there?

[Azalroth]

They're still hot. I don't care.

I'll go with that

[Converge]

i find them to be the same old mainstream softcore in a brand new package. All the traditional hetero-centrist pornographic qualities exist (bi-sexualism, blank stares, submissive poses) and the only change to the image is tattoos and piercings. Still the same old curves and whatnot of the previous pornography.

 

My biggest concern (and what got me asking about them) is the groups of teenie-boppers who rave about this 're-definition' of beauty. Once they buy into it, they'll cheer being accepted for who they are with their tattos and piercings (ohhhhhhhhhhh cuttting edge) and still wonder why if your not skinny with decent boobs people still don't think your hot.

[mrs jesus]

i find them to be the same old mainstream softcore in a brand new package. All the traditional hetero-centrist pornographic qualities exist (bi-sexualism, blank stares, submissive poses) and the only change to the image is tattoos and piercings. Still the same old curves and whatnot of the previous pornography.

 

My biggest concern (and what got me asking about them) is the groups of teenie-boppers who rave about this 're-definition' of beauty. Once they buy into it, they'll cheer being accepted for who they are with their tattos and piercings (ohhhhhhhhhhh cuttting edge) and still wonder why if your not skinny with decent boobs people still don't think your hot.

exactly.

[Dan #2]

i like skinny pierced tattooed girls, but none of them are even alive.

[saturnine]

i like tattoos, piercings, boobs, girls and devil music. ;)

[Ravenous itchy]

<boobs3

 

8

[Prometheon]

I dunno guys, I've seen hotter...

[Azalroth]

As have I....just have to walk around Residence a bit or walk through the mall on the way home after work....

[Dan #2]

godsgirls is the anti-porn the anti-porn kids are looking for.

[mrs jesus]

i like tattoos, piercings, boobs, girls and devil music. ;)

you forgot fire and robots, and i am so happy to see that av again, satty! you make me want to bring back the anal heart, just for the sake of old times.