Just Saw Batman Begins For 1st Time

[Moonlight_Graham]

Wow, that is one kick-ass movie. Definately as good as Spider-Man. Great casting, Bale/Holmes/Neeson/Freemon were excellent as were the rest. I like how they built up the Bruce Wayne character and his background instead of just relying on showing Batman fighting for 2 hours. I mean it was actually a great movie with or without Batman.

 

Easily the best Batman movie ever and one of the best superhero flicks ever alongside Spiderman.

[Monochrome Rainbow]

Waaaaaaaaay better than Spiderman.

[Jarrod]

i thought it sucked.

 

booooring.

 

i also thought spiderman sucked.

 

i'll stick with batman returns.

[Shiri]

Spiderman was more fun.

[Prometheon]

I like em both, though I preferred Spider Man 2 to the original.

[Ryan44]

It was the ONLY good superhero flick to date. the rest were total let downs, they might have neat graphics and cgi but the story lines in each were so weak. oy vey.

[5ilent Narcotic]

I liked the fact they didnt do CGI overkill with Batman.

 

Spiderman 2 is better than the first.

Batman is dark again the way it should be.

And X2 was better than Xmen.

[benneb]

yah i agree batman begins is awesome

[Moonlight_Graham]

also to note:

 

- the only thing i didn't like about Batman Begins is that Batman's ears look dumb. They point in toward the head, instead of pointing straight up like they always do. I think it looks lame.

 

- and oh yeah, the new batmobile is the most bad-ass batmobile ever by far & one of the coolest cars ever!

 

- i agree Spiderman 2 was better than part 1.

 

- i liked the 1st xmen flick better than X2.

[Dan #3]

Batman 1967 > All other Batman movies.

[5ilent Narcotic]

I think they whole ears thing was done because it looks more like a bat that way.

 

At least it wasn't Adam West style.

Edited January 8, 2006 by 5ilent Narcotic

[Dan #3]

Don't be knocking Adam West Five-lent.

[Moonlight_Graham]

Batman 1967 > All other Batman movies.

please stop.

[Shiri]

I haven't seen Spiderman 2... Should I?

[Dan #3]

Batman 1967 > All other Batman movies.

please stop.

I'm quite serious. I have it on DVD, it's one of my favourite movies.

[Prometheon]

I haven't seen Spiderman 2... Should I?

Yeah, you definately should if you liked the original at all. It's much better with a lot of very cool and humourous character building scenes for Peter Parker. It's a well done flick if you ignore some of the horrible dialouge between Peter and Mary Jane.

Edited January 8, 2006 by Prometheon

[5ilent Narcotic]

It's no worse than Anakin and Padme speaking to each other.

 

Five-lent? Why?

Edited January 8, 2006 by 5ilent Narcotic

[Moonlight_Graham]

It's no worse than Anakin and Padme speaking to each other.

 

Five-lent? Why?

nothing is worse than that. NOTHING.

[Dan #3]

Five-lent? Why?

I should think that that is obvious.

[rmak]

anakin, ur breaking my heart.

[darko]

This movie was really not that great. They dialogue was terrible throughout the movie. The cinematography and plot were pretty great, even the acting wasn't all that bad, but they lost me with their attempts at being witty (i.e. doing this damn reverse comment like 10 times in the movie, for example "didnt you get the memo?", "mind your surroundings" etc. They repeat crap in different contexts to be clever, but just look stupid.)

 

I've seen far better.

[Matt]

I saw this one awhile back and I thought it was pretty good too.

[ryanolmstead]

it was one of the better comic book movies to date, but did anyone else find Bale's Batman voice a bit annoying after awhile?

[cleric9999]

i think going with christian bale was a good casting choice. he also kicked some ass in equilibrium.