Jump to content
Matt

What Are You Reading?

Recommended Posts

Perestroika, by Mikhail Gorbachov. It's actually not too didactic or authoritarian in style, which is good. Unfortunately, because Gorbachov was still very much a product of the Soviet system, the book contains a number of propagandized historical references. And because it was published in 1987, I doubt he could be as open about the reform program as he'd like.

 

On the plus side, I got it at a book sale, and it only cost 25 cents.

 

Next on the list, "Annals of an Abiding Liberal", by John Kenneth Galbraith. Which I got at the same incredible book sale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, Mrs. Jesus...you make me sound legendary. No one else here on that level but you. Simple answer, when I'm at home alone in the evenings, I'm writing. I've been churning out some of the most amazing stuff over the last month or so. I clocked in at 435 pages. I'm doing some loose editing and adjusting, because I'm a perfectionist...but I've already started work on the second book on the series.

 

What kind of subject matter do you write about? Genres etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've actually been writing for years. I just finished book one of my Scifi series, which is my baby. I've also got a police thriller set in Rhode Island, that I've been noodling with for several years. I've been toying with a angst/romance novel for awhile, and finally seem to be on a good track with it.

 

I've written several large volumes of poetry, and I'm waiting on a friend to become available to look over my notes on a period in my life, because I think it would make an interesting book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dawkins is definitely one of my favourite authors ever and his scientific insight and positioning on societal issues speaks to me very closely.

You know, I agree with Dawkins like 95% of the time, but him and Christopher Hitchens manage to be about as painfully annoying in their correctness as possible. I support his goals, but I feel like a little more evangelicalism and a little less smugness would get more people on his side.

 

And I'm 80% done Nobokov's Lolita. SO fantastic. It's creepy, touching, and makes you question the reality of 'love.' There are so many passages that just make your heart ache with romance and affection...and then you realize they're written by an old man to a 14 year old and it really fucks with you.

See, I never made it past the inherent hilarity of Humbert's character. Everything about him is so constantly ridiculous that it's hard to believe anybody but a 14 year old would be involved with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently read a book called "Total Oblivion, More or Less" which was fucking fantastic. Currently reading "the Ninja Handbook" by the creators of the Ask a Ninja website, and I'll be starting No Country for Old Men pretty quick.

 

No Country for Old Men is great. The movie captured pretty much the entirety of the novel in a beautiful way, but McCarthy's writing is just so hard to beat. I don't think I really agree with the themes he's playing with, but I'm also not even 30. I'll give him another 20 years and see if I feel a bit different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one thing I don't really like about his writing is his like of quotes when someone is speaking- it can make things a bit confusing at times. Really enjoying the book so far though, maybe even a bit more than I liked the Road.

 

Ha, that's actually one of my favorite things. As somebody who sometimes has to fight to read prose and not skim to get to more dialogue, it demands a bit more attention from me. Jose Saramago (Blindness, The Cave) does it as well, or at least his translators do.

 

It always surprises me how his books stay so meaty in subtext while being almost breezy in readability. Guys got a death grip on plotting and pacing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was different times man. He was handsome, made a decent living, and exuded intelligence. Humbert's character is what MAKES Lolita. I suggest giving it another go.

 

I'm actually reading a collection of Nabokov's short stories right now, and while there is the occasional dud, they are excellent on the whole.

 

I also just finished David Sedaris` When You Are Engulfed In Flames. Sedaris is my favourite humor writer, and if you're not averse to bursting out into laughter at unexpected and sometimes inappropriate times, he comes strongly recommended.

Edited by Prometheon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a couple of Sedaris books at HMV and am thinking of picking a couple up. Finished No Country for Old Men the other day, and if I recally correctly, the movie ended much more happily than the book does. I guess we will find out when I watch the movie again soon.

 

Picked up Ray Kurzeil's "The Age of Spiritual Machines" today, will start Tuesday probably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I just miss a conversation about Lolita? That's one of my favourite books. Just finished re-reading it about a month ago.

 

Owen's right, it's Humbert Humbert's humanity and upbringing, that really makes Lolita. It's funny, though, everyone I've spoken to, who's also read the book, are always so horrified when I say I identify and feel so sad for HH. I've always likened it a bit to Margaret Atwood's "Alias Grace", in terms of debate over who's guilty and not.

 

Right now, I'm reading "The Lovely Bones". I had dismissed it as shitty chicklit, but it's turning out pretty engaging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trace-face: I agree with you. I don't think Humbert is a "monster." In the end, SHE seduced HIM. Though yeah, the whole deal with the sleeping pills was fucked up. We all wrestle with our own personal demons. His personal demon just happened to be an affinity for young girls, and he chose to be that way even less so than an alcoholic chooses to drink.

 

I don't know. Humbert IS disgusting in many many places. But in the end, I pity rather than hate him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trace-face: I agree with you. I don't think Humbert is a "monster." In the end, SHE seduced HIM. Though yeah, the whole deal with the sleeping pills was fucked up. We all wrestle with our own personal demons. His personal demon just happened to be an affinity for young girls, and he chose to be that way even less so than an alcoholic chooses to drink.

 

I don't know. Humbert IS disgusting in many many places. But in the end, I pity rather than hate him.

 

Definitely. I always noticed that whenever he did anything "monsterly" it was always with a great wringing of hands. I could nearly feel the desperation he felt. Perhaps it's because I identify a little. Not with the affinity for young girls, but rather the desperate, aching need.

 

I acknowledge the argument my friend had, about Lolita's actions. She brings up a good point, that Lolita acted in the only way she could, in order to "take charge" of a situation where she's effectively helpless.

 

I do understand that, but at the same time, at the risk of being colloquial, she's such a spoiled little bitch ;) It's hard to see her as a victim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.